Asrock H67M-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H67M-ITX (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110621
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '18 at 11:11
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2125-$152 639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 196 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0112) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 133 108 105 112 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 398 Write 270 Mixed 293 SusWrite 134 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 25.3 87% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 28 24% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 91%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 52GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 32 31 32 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 47.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 31.3 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 72GB free Firmware: ML6OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 70 72 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 70.5 Write 71 Mixed 41 SusWrite 70.8 46% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DBLT4GN568S 2x4GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.6% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-ITX Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-ITX

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	5x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	4x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
Smartbuy 60GBSSDBench 51%, 259 samples	2x
Force GS 128GBCorsair $150Bench 74%, 5,048 samples	2x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 46%, 1,530 samples	2x
M379B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 795 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $568

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16