Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 23:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 127
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 233
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 89.3
60% 77.7 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 59.2
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 440
Mixed 428
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 49.9
163% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 238
178% 237 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
146GB free
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,776
Write 54.9
Mixed 108
204% 979 MB/s
4K Read 326
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 6.6
504% 112 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
710GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 27 26 27 29 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
749GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 192 190 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 174
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 188
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback