Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 174 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 352 48% 355 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 838A) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 4.34 4% 5.16 fps	MRender 7.38 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 3.61 4% 5.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 192 170 167 162 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 303 Write 374 Mixed 288 SusWrite 194 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 35.3 119% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.6 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 38.1 33% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 39GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 64 67 46 44 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 408 Write 379 Mixed 287 SusWrite 90.3 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 38.1 124% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.8 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 52.8 47% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBSR Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16