Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7910
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds)
Memory	58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '18 at 13:10
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3 437 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 680 63% 525 Pts	64-Core 1,668 103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 416.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21% Poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 52.8 16% 37.4 fps	MRender 46.4 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 27.5 30% 38.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM84 256GB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 71 30 24 20 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.6% Poor	Read 171 Write 122 Mixed 166 SusWrite 43.3 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 11.1 38% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 78.6 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 75.9 56% 75 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 94%
Sandisk S12 126GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 117GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 321 338 338 338 336 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 382 Write 266 Mixed 110 SusWrite 328 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 9.5 36% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 19.3 16% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 637GB free Firmware: JC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 104 104 109 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 108 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 107 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	60x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples	57x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	102x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	70x

SSD
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples	68x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	29x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x

RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 8x8GBMicronBench 112%, 172 samples	40x
HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 8x8GBHynixBench 112%, 137 samples	33x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GBHynixBench 109%, 271 samples	33x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16