Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5550U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 250
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 4
Parallax 11.7
4% 6.83 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 9.57
Splatting 7.74
6% 7.15 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 63GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 77 82 79 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 443
Write 77.7
Mixed 117
SusWrite 80
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 7.5
72% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 68.8
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 51.6
46% 67.5 MB/s
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
365GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 100 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 83.1
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 102
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
14GB free, PID 1000, Jetflash 16Gb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 19.8
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 15.2
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 33%
SAMSUNG HM120JI 120GB
112GB free, PID fc86
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 15.9
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 16.1
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback