Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 16:49
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 245
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 586
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2519 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 141
Parallax 120
112% 133 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 131
Splatting 104
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 417
Mixed 339
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 48.7
168% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
498GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 112 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66% Good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 67
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 75.5
Write 74
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 77.1
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 55%
Kingston FCR-HS219/1 16GB
4GB free, PID 6148
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 12
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 1.3
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.6
72% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 17%
Kingston FCR-HS219/1 8GB
2GB free, PID 6148
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 10.8
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback