Hyrican GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHyrican GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2H
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140910
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 18:54
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 361
51% 375 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 6.69
0% 4.48 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 8.26
5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 39 38 39 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 72
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 41.2
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 54%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
50GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 64 64 67 63 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 77.8
Write 29.7
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 63.3
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
865GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 102 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 87
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 104
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
57GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 36
Write 17
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 18.8
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.3
122% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
355GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 35.8
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 37
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 60%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
16GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 25
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 25.9
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
24% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Hyrican GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback