Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 05:33
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 226
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 683
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 133
Parallax 134
120% 138 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 118 115 117 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 404
Write 138
Mixed 189
SusWrite 118
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 35.5
139% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 116
99% 146 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
216GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 139 141 140 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 136
Write 95.5
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 139
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
110GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 92.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 95.8
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
170GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 70.8
Write 69.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 90.2
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 69%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 85 77 73 88 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 56.7
Write 130
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 95.4
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback