Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 117
55% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 243
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 04A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 43.2
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 37.3
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 102 86 94 88 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 450
Write 431
Mixed 347
SusWrite 121
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 42.2
135% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 180
153% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 118%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
37GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 56 60 70 63 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 312
Write 153
Mixed 138
SusWrite 122
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 10.2
55% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 30.4
23% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
378GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 160
Write 135
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 104
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
982GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 170 168 172 170 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 116
Mixed 82
SusWrite 169
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
724GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 155 158 159 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 112
Write 98.7
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 158
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 15.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback