Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 07:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 130
59% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 436
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 40.7
38% 44.5 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 38.1
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 173 171 166 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 444
Mixed 356
SusWrite 189
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 49.2
165% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 184
157% 230 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 118%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
914GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 109 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 109
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 7.7 8.4 9.3 7.9 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 6
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 7.9
16% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.4
219% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-048.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 99U5403-048.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback