Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 137
59% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 331
35% 281 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.57
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 7
0% 5.57 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 0.09
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD24
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,847
Write 34
Mixed 49.2
700% 977 MB/s
4K Read 298
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
12,508% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback