PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7817 |
Motherboard | MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140220 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '18 at 12:40 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
CPU Throttled | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.5%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 34 34 38 33 MB/s
|
20.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 19 19 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
546GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 19 20 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 891x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 428x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 387x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 366x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 292x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 279x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $354 |