PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150904 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '18 at 12:16 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 114 129 124 141 146 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
596GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 97 96 96 96 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
188GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 33 29 33 34 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 24GB
860, 860, 860, 860 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $253 |