DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory13.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 16:35
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 140
57% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 267
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.8% Good
Lighting 67
Reflection 102
Parallax 91.9
55% 86.9 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 97.7
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 81 84 83 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 118
Write 91.2
Mixed 111
SusWrite 83.1
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 16.2
55% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 117
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 61%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
107GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 76 74 75 77 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 146
Write 74
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 79.8
17% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 10.7
44% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 48.9
DQ Mixed 2.8
28% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
240GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 86.6
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
296GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 77 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 98
Write 90.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 76.3
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback