Lenovo 6313ML3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemLenovo 6313ML3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 6313ML3
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 18 '16 at 05:53
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 65.3
25% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 65.4
8-Core 65.5
9% 65.4 Pts
64-Core 65.5
4% 65.5 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M
Legend(17AA 20D8) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 3.2 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.8
1% 2.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$89
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 256
Write 134
Mixed 174
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 11.7
55% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 26.6
27% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback