| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 13.4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 01 '18 at 17:17 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7640X-$66
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
|
73%
Very good
|
97% 181 Pts
|
49% 361 Pts
|
31% 502 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
89.1%
Excellent
|
96% 103 fps
|
76% 93.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 353 380 400 400 411 MB/s
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
89% 395 MB/s
|
138% 54.4 MB/s
|
228% 321 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 188 191 188 191 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
101% 141 MB/s
|
164% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
SABRENT 120GB
105GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 45 135 78 79 80 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
52.6%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
53% 75 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 493x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 260x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $795 |