PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7978 |
Motherboard | MSI H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978) (all builds) |
Memory | 29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150814 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '18 at 18:34 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.9%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 289 290 293 292 293 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
0GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 158 164 165 166 165 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 145 147 144 144 MB/s
|
89.2%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 62 62 62 63 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
0GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.5 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
46.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 297x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 227x |
Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 194x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 163x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 113x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 111x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $408 |