User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer C1_MB
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180706
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '18 at 23:13
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 172 57% 103 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 318 32% 261 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.47 16% 6.47 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 618 627 617 619 631 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 920 Write 686 Mixed 964 SusWrite 634 180% 801 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 20.1 119% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 288 221% 300 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 296%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 144 118 141 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 342 Write 347 Mixed 352 SusWrite 137 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 16.3 44% 11 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.2% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 20.6 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16