Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 03:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 161
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 280
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 42.2
41% 46.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 44
Splatting 38.6
33% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 215 213 160 184 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 218
Write 208
Mixed 204
SusWrite 197
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 29.3
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
474GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 155 145 159 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 153
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback