Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 182 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 311 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 70 50 50 48 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 387 Write 309 Mixed 298 SusWrite 83.1 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 42.3 156% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 326 252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 283GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 48 47 46 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 109 Write 91.7 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 49.8 61% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.2% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 20.3 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	25x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16