| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161101 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '18 at 13:24 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
88% 158 Pts
|
67% 504 Pts
|
31% 495 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
31% 34.9 fps
|
27% 34.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 202 202 200 200 205 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
66% 299 MB/s
|
143% 56.3 MB/s
|
222% 320 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
185GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 60 59 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
35% 47.5 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
75.7%
Very good
|
76% 26.8 GB/s
|
65% 22.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 552 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $295
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 93x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 73x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 60x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $679 |