PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '18 at 19:07 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 500GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 171 160 155 183 159 MB/s
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
281GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 39 11 28 26 31 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 835x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 462x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 282x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 148x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 142x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $924 |