| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121114 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 08 '18 at 17:16 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 73% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
36.3%
Below average
|
34% 48.7 Pts
|
9% 66.6 Pts
|
5% 74.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.9%
Below average
|
34% 46.4 fps
|
33% 41.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 32 49 62 80 70 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
40% 54.9 MB/s
|
115% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
22.4%
Poor
|
23% 7.9 GB/s
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,855 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 506x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $138 |