Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 52.8 1-Core 31 2-Core 54.2 31% 46 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 93.3 13% 97.7 Pts	64-Core 106 7% 106 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.04 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 1.6 13 4.9 179 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 360 Write 205 Mixed 179 SusWrite 77.8 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 6.6 32% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 64.2 DQ Mixed 33.2 39% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3190ME76F8F1600 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 6GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	205x
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	102x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	92x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	202x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	102x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	94x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	54x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	25x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	12x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16