| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 09 '18 at 01:15 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.5%
Above average
|
61% 98.6 Pts
|
26% 193 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 314.22
|
19%
Very poor
|
18% 22.6 fps
|
21% 25.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 127 132 132 98 91 MB/s
|
44.1%
Average
|
35% 156 MB/s
|
77% 27.1 MB/s
|
54% 89.8 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
437GB free
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 88 93 93 92 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
58% 79.1 MB/s
|
93% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
350GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
82% 111 MB/s
|
133% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33.7%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
54% 73.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 48x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 41x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |