Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 08:03
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 156
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 489
47% 388 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1355 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 92.1
62% 77.1 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 81.7
58% 69.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 116 117 114 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62% Good
Read 390
Write 121
Mixed 178
SusWrite 114
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 29.2
106% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 139
108% 148 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 82%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
158GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,874
Write 3,276
Mixed 3,311
777% 3,487 MB/s
4K Read 272
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 0
508% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 8.5
75% 176 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 135 135 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 142
Write 129
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 136
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 1TB
406GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 52 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 67
Write 68
Mixed 43
SusWrite 52.6
77% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $679
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback