bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 01:54
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 371
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB; Gigabyte GT 1030 OC
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 20.8
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 20.9
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 291 292 286 283 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 445
Mixed 365
SusWrite 302
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65
205GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 81.8
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 71%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 52 51 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 51.9
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 51.5
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback