To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 69.3 40% 59 Pts	4-Core 69.4 8-Core 69.1 9% 69.2 Pts	64-Core 69.7 4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 43 45 45 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 43.8 Write 15.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 44.5 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 70% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 31%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 153GB free Firmware: P22OAB3A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 73 Write 69 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 72.9 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 39%
hp v220w 8GB 718 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 5a07, hp metal 8gb Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.2 1.9 3 2.8 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.5 5% 4.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 7%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 911GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 22 Write 19.8 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 23.4 28% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	706x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16