Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell PowerEdge T110 II
Motherboard	Dell PowerEdge T110 II (all builds)
Memory	21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	28 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 07:17
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 145 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 457 48% 383 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 120 212 184 131 164 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.8% Good	Read 225 Write 212 Mixed 210 SusWrite 157 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 37.4 124% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 172 134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 118%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 14GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 211 229 214 172 206 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.6% Average	Read 214 Write 188 Mixed 163 SusWrite 205 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 16.5 59% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 109 83% 115 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 76%
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$66 1,945 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 197GB free Firmware: PA09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 63 55 79 77 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 89.4 Write 59.1 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 67.4 43% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M391B1G73BH0-YH9 4x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	5x
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples	4x

SSD
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GBBench 96%, 6,836 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 55%, 367 samples	6x
M391B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 41%, 28 samples	3x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBUnknownBench 33%, 27 samples	3x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $364

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16