Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 03:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 122
58% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 416
39% 324 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 93.2
53% 76 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 57
52% 64 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 170 145 143 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 457
Write 328
Mixed 264
SusWrite 163
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 34.3
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 107
119% 201 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 110%
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
17GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 72 66 76 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 428
Write 216
Mixed 235
SusWrite 72.5
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 15.4
49% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 156
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
80GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 350 403 414 412 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 437
Mixed 373
SusWrite 389
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 49.8
154% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 261
194% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback