Asrock H87 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140709
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '18 at 14:51
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$65 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 50.4 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 52.3 28% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 90.7 8-Core 169 15% 130 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 3004) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.8% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 60.3 36% 45.4 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 39.9 33% 40 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 20 28 27 30 32 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 265 Write 11.7 Mixed 170 SusWrite 29.5 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 11.1 40% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 139 112% 158 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 121GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 151 126 133 119 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 152 Write 151 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 132 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB 14,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	90x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	49x
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $413

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16