Asrock Z87 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140711
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 21:05
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 181 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 342 44% 335 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 55.6 Reflection 54.5 Parallax 70.6 45% 60.2 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 64 Splatting 42.8 46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 424 Write 433 Mixed 337 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 41.7 147% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 231 198% 292 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 55GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 360 423 434 435 438 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 460 Mixed 378 SusWrite 395 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 56.5 190% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 766GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 147 148 148 124 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 158 Write 154 Mixed 20 SusWrite 142 85% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	MC Read 26 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 23.4 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 21.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 57.1 70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Pro4 - $170

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	60x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	31x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	30x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $86Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	15x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16