PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090804 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '19 at 04:31 |
Run Duration | 215 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 90 92 91 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
HP v125w 4GB
3GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.8 2 MB/s
|
3.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
4GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 12 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
61GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 8x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $501 |