Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 260
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 1,017
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,804
112% 1,804 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,484
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 228
Parallax 227
124% 202 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 220
Splatting 135
158% 202 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 129%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 928 572 567 567 591 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,250
Write 1,442
Mixed 1,043
SusWrite 829
309% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 76.4
271% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 1037
DQ Mixed 1,140
855% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 275%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
228GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1261 365 310 310 305 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,066
Write 1,287
Mixed 822
SusWrite 477
257% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 69.8
255% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 989
759% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 236%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1265 362 315 315 315 315 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2059
Write 1,266
Mixed 800
SusWrite 481
254% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 68.8
258% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 982
755% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 237%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
903GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 425 400 396 389 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 372
Mixed 388
SusWrite 406
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 45.1
158% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
238GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 423 398 394 386 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 348
Mixed 333
SusWrite 403
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 38.8
144% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 57.1
MC Mixed 35.3
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 9.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,628
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback