PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101029 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 13 '19 at 15:53 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.93
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 21 25 22 24 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
74GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 23 25 23 25 MB/s
|
26%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
124GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 78 83 84 84 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
133GB free
Firmware: DA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 78 83 84 85 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 320GB
45GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 22 26 26 26 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Maxell External USB 3.0 1TB
119GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |