PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20181011 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '19 at 15:09 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
72%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
|
22.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 167 157 171 193 168 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
47GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 16 19 11 12 MB/s
|
7.54%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,233x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 948x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 401x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 411x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 381x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 284x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |