Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 19:15
Run Duration883 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 222
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 682
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 300 293 297 291 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,245
Mixed 644
SusWrite 321
206% 929 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.1
184% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 816
616% 829 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 174%
Great: 280%
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
185GB free
Firmware: V8X01c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 260 259 262 266 256 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 222
Write 249
Mixed 210
SusWrite 259
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 19.5
73% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 174
132% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
865GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 168 169 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 127
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 166
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 158 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 132
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 155
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
929GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 168 169 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 144
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 168
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 31.8
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 33
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 27
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback