Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180507
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 424 57% 424 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 6 Parallax 4.09 4% 5.06 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 3.65 4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 186 180 172 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 367 Write 258 Mixed 260 SusWrite 170 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 39.8 152% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 178 138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 85%
Netac 240GB 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 552GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 89 89 89 88 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 79 Write 88.6 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 87.8 18% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 3% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 12.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 13.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	415x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	241x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	220x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	193x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	82x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16