Dell Latitude XT2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude XT2  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M373P
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 17:37
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9600
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 36.8
32% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 37.8
8-Core 35.5
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 37.7
2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Dell(1028 0252) 264MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.28 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1229GSGF 80GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PT00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 26 22 24 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 26.1
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 24.5
13% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.26% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 0.1
5% 1.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 0
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback