Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 79.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 274 90% 165 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 722 75% 601 Pts	64-Core 728 45% 728 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 872F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 7.41 0% 5.56 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 14.9 8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 59.9 54% 65.1 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 67.5 55% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 32 19 26 34 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 469 Write 48.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 28.3 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 8.6 74% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 53.7 DQ Mixed 3.7 26% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 99GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 107 109 107 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 14.8 Write 142 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 108 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 903GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 172 173 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 160 Mixed 113 SusWrite 172 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 1x8GB 2,457 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	268x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	267x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,223

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16