| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RF511/RF411/RF711 |
| Memory | 7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121127 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '19 at 23:06 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.6%
Average
|
58% 94.8 Pts
|
17% 162 Pts
|
4% 71.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.81%
Terrible
|
2% 2.02 fps
|
2% 2.49 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 236 234 226 216 222 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
52% 229 MB/s
|
103% 33.9 MB/s
|
150% 200 MB/s
|
|
ASMT 2115 750GB
9GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 25 24 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
30% 22.7 MB/s
|
45% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
35.4%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
54% 73.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RF511/RF411/RF711 Builds (Compare 301 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 86x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 76x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 163x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 70x |
| GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $227 |