Asus P5KPL/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090701
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 04:53
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 103
48% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 186
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13.6
0% 9.1 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 9.03
Splatting 16.1
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 86 90 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 149
Write 158
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 82.7
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 91 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 176
Write 178
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 89.9
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 108%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
1TB free, PID 01ea
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.19% Terrible
Read 31.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 5.5
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
58GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.6 4.3 4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 11
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 4.2
18% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.5
229% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 27.6
Mixed 27
SusWrite 5.5
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 57%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
2TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.4 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 5.5
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 5.5
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
810GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.7 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 28.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 5.6
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 20%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 35
Write 28.6
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 5.5
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 5
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL/EPU Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $360
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback