Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '16 at 07:45
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 199 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 598 61% 491 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1035.1001 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.4% Average	Lighting 58.1 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 82.1 47% 68.6 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 57.1 Splatting 54.1 48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 18328628 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -19945828122340 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 275 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 20 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 39 94491836449 (C2) HDA temperature 33 39 94491836449 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18328628 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18328628 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18328628 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 94489280512 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1151 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1147 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1147 (F2) Unknown 0 0 473 (F4) Unknown 100 100 720898	47.5% Average	Read 399 Write 195 Mixed 258 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 10 55% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 47.6 DQ Mixed 31.5 37% 65 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 538GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 208141616 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 531 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 205168509 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7516 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 374 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 6 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 521535519 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8086 (C2) HDA temperature 31 42 77309411359 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -61065845007231 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11272043805 (F2) Unknown 100 253 43504441579	90.2% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 152 Mixed 146 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.22 88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 112%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 247GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7488 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4664 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 63649 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1585 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 40 29 (C2) HDA temperature 151 58 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23485 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	35.7% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 62.8 Mixed 64.9 48% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.36 86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x4GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	425x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	48x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16