| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170704 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '19 at 19:38 |
| Run Duration | 304 Seconds |
| Run User | TUN-User |
| Background CPU | 50% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.5%
Very good
|
72% 126 Pts
|
47% 349 Pts
|
22% 352 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
|
1.11%
Terrible
|
0% 4.82 fps
|
3% 4.51 fps
| |
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
30% 31.8 fps
|
30% 36.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 8.2 5.9 4.9 5 MB/s
|
6.43%
Terrible
|
10% 12.7 MB/s
|
4% 0.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.3%
Below average
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
26% 8.97 GB/s
|
49% 81.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,536 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 921x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 373x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 272x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 521x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 302x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |