Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '19 at 20:43
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 169 59% 105 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 839 70% 607 Pts	64-Core 2,338 145% 2,338 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 44.9 Parallax 39.9 37% 43.5 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 41 Splatting 36.2 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 78GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 304 296 300 291 288 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 475 Mixed 412 SusWrite 314 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 46 150% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 192 142% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2270 573 572 571 572 569 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,535 Write 2,254 Mixed 1,632 SusWrite 854 406% 1,819 MB/s	4K Read 69.4 4K Write 222 4K Mixed 91.8 340% 128 MB/s	DQ Read 1,601 DQ Write 1,348 DQ Mixed 1,420 1,078% 1,456 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 340%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 29GB free Firmware: SD2B SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 56 53 53 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 69.5 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 53.3 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 343GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 111 111 110 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 152 Write 126 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 110 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 150GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 98 104 102 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 176 Write 116 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 103 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS726020ALE614 2TB 380 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 312GB free Firmware: APGNW7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 101 103 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 128 Write 133 Mixed 72 SusWrite 103 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 191% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 115%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 22GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.2 8.2 8.5 9 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Read 29 Write 6 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 8.3 17% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB 4,320 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	MC Read 69.1 MC Write 66.2 MC Mixed 65.8 192% 67 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 25.2 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16