Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core 2,134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 127 57% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 196 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 344.75 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.8% Below average	Lighting 44.9 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 55.5 37% 46.9 fps	MRender 56.4 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 0.13 22% 31.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.3 8.2 8.9 12 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 57.6 Write 48.7 Mixed 35.1 SusWrite 11.5 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 50%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 4.1 4 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 4.3 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.1 10% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	18x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	16x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
GP-GSTFS311 120GBGigabyteBench 30%, 201 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16