PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120821 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Feb 03 '19 at 14:54 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31225 @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 5.9 GHz
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 530 Series 480GB-$301
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 134 141 43 155 205 MB/s
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Sandisk S4 512GB
44GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 303 301 291 294 287 MB/s
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
7.3%
Terrible
|
||||
12.4%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 90x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 59x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $436 |