Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A2
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180803
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '19 at 09:04
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 87.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 618 65% 521 Pts	64-Core 618 38% 618 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.89 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24% Poor	Lighting 30.2 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 27.9 25% 29.7 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 27.8 23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFD 256GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: A001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 327 313 162 149 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 345 Write 451 Mixed 369 SusWrite 235 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 29.8 123% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 287 206% 263 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 912GB free Firmware: 1A01 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 186 Mixed 142 126% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 1,175 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.1 7 7.1 7.4 7.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Read 16 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 7 10% 8.45 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 24.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	10x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	4x
MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 673 samples	4x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	3x

RAM
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 124 samples	7x
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 105%, 146 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $51Bench 71%, 7,248 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16