PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 3010 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 3010 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121207 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 08 '19 at 01:04 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 31 27 14 45 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
128GB free
Firmware: 1AC01122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 95 96 97 96 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
13GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2 1.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 MB/s
|
5.38%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,026x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 549x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 347x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,055x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 298x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 262x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |