Asus N55SF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus N55SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SF
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 142
59% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 306
32% 257 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2050) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.93
5% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 52 78 96 10 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 336
Write 198
Mixed 197
SusWrite 86
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 11.1
60% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 90.1
90% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback